user created polls & quizzes      

ISRAEL VS. IRAN


[+] ballot by some_guy_from_texas

Speaking hypothetically, if Iran and Israel were to get in a convential war right now. Who would win and/or how would it end. I would have to give it to Israel.

P.S. Remember Iran has 11,000,000 armed men in their militia. But Israel has the world's most kickass commandos. And O' yea, I'm not a Jew or Muslim just Portuguese-Mexican.
this ballot was closed by maintainer :
LCD : on Oct 06, 2014 because Michael Brown is a nigger.

Israel
Iran
Iran would win definately. Do you know how motivated they are.?
SORRY, THIS POLL
IS NOW CLOSED.

Ballot #105258 :
Voting Finished : SEE RESULTS

Comment:
Register to submit comments
You may still vote without registration

show your vote with comment?

v 2.0 © BESTANDWORST.COM
smile bank:








similiar ballots:
99373. Israel VS Lebanon, Syria & Iran
127563. Will Israel Eventually Bomb Iran's Nuclear Reactor?
59763. Why is the western world in an uproar over Iran obtaining nuclear weapons when Israel (70 UN resolutions against it) has a stockade of nukes?
16878. Is the conflict between Israel and Palestina unfair because the jews of the USA congress supports Israel with weapons?
112450. Is talking about a possible war with Iran "protecting Iran?"
139127. Where is Israel?
64869. Iran: He wouldn't, would he ...?
10186. Does Israel want only peace?
17485. Should we invade Israel?
100751. Should We Trust Israel?



COMMENTS:
Jappy?
Voted : Israel
israel hands down. their military it top notch.
wtf Jappy!?!?
Probably Israel, but it wouldnt be as easy as many people here predict. The Tsahal is very impressive in action but considering its performance in Lebanon for example i'd say that the jewish "deus ex machina" has seen better days.
Besides you need to have a solid and committed government behind your army in times of conflict, and these wouldnt be the adjectives i'd use to describe the israeli gov...

Iran. Israel recently proved that they couldn't a little country like Lebanon.
and unlke Lebanon, Iran not only has a real airforce, but the Iranian pilots are famously top notch.
Israel would rather have someone else do their dirty work. They have all the U.S. goyim at their disposal to use as cannon fodder.
"wtf Jappy!?!?"

Eh? ... this ballot sounded kinda like one of the many recent jappy ballots.I was surprized it wasn't.

Voted : Israel
Iran would kick Israel's ass. I'm being ironic. Israel would win. They've got way more to lose and their whole population would join in.
{They've got way more to lose and their whole population would join in.
by TomSmith on Tue Nov 14, 06 5:43pm}

What a silly comment!

Iran certainly has way more to lose. Do you seriosly think that after seeing what's happening to Iraq that the Iranian people are going to let that happen to them???

and besides, a great many experts rate the Iranian fighter pilots as better than any other nation in the Middle East - including Israel.

The Iranian army is HUGE as well. Very well equipped despite their technology not being entirely equivalent, because they have LOADS OF MONEY from all their oil.

Iran also has extremly advanced rocketry technology, and the Russians and Chinese sold them far more advanced cruise missiles than anything in the USA and Israeli military can stop.

Voted : Iran
and Israel's "kick ass" commandos have been proven to be overhyped myth after that debacle in Lebanon.
Hezbollah is not officially listed as a terrorist organisation except by six countries around the UK, Israel, USA axis.

Israel did lose the war against Hezbollah. The attempted invsaion of Lebanon was a clumsy disaster.

The Israeli soldiers were totally unprepared for fighting the Hezbollah, and their military casualties were higher. By comparison they were practically slaughtered. Only the Israeli airforce did anything right, but the Israeli airforce also bombed civilian residential areas and dropped cluster bombs in huge numbers in the last 72 hours of the fighting when a ceasefire was already scheduled and known to start soon - that last act with the cluster bombs could only be called malicious spite.

How could Israel fight Iran when they couldn't even defeat tiny Lebanon?

It wouldnt even be close. Israel would crush them and they wouldnt need anything but their air force.

Daughter_of_Khitai : If Israel were to actually TRY to destroy Palestine, rest assured, there would be no Palestine today.

I'll bet anything you want to bet on that.

(If Israel were to actually TRY to destroy Palestine,
by ploink on Sun May 20, 07 10:34pm)

They are trying to destroy Palestine and the Palestinian people.

EVERYONE KNOWS THIS.

So your pretense otherwise is a little weak, don't you think?

(Israel would crush them and they wouldnt need anything but their air force.
by ploink on Sun May 20, 07 10:34pm)

You conquer or defeat any nation by aerial bombardment alone. It never works, and never has worked. Besides, Israel lost when they took on little itsy bitsy Lebanon, so what chance would they have against a real opponent like Iran which is far bigger and better equipped? None. You're deluding yourself if you think Israel could win.

That's why the Zion-fascists are trying to get the USA to do the dirty work for them.

You CAN NOT conquer or defeat any nation by aerial bombardment alone. It never works, and never has worked
Voted : Israel
Isreal would win by sheer smarts, not by numbers.
21st.Century Tech will defeat lotsa inflated,overly-emotional Persians on camels, with heads tied in towels.
(that's how I see them,l sorreee!)

(Isreal would win by sheer smarts, not by numbers
by aplmac on Wed Jun 13, 07 6:34am)

Then the Israelis have lost already.

Isn't FiddleFaddleOnLSD's vote spamming big and blatant?

Voted : Iran
Gotta disagree with ID
Iran active militia personal number

11,000,000

IDF active personal number

176,500

sorry about the third choice. it was an accident as i thought the choice box was a comment box. please ignore it.
"Iran also has extremly advanced rocketry technology, and the Russians and Chinese sold them far more advanced cruise missiles than anything in the USA and Israeli military can stop."

They are not more advanced, and they are not technically called cruise missiles. ICBM sounds better. However, they have a few ICBM, and MANY ballistic missiles. They have 50,000 to 110, 000 types of rockets and missiles pointed at Israel, many of them are unguided (many in lebanon), but there are so many that the damage would be extreme, there is no question about it. How do you know that these "cruise" missiles are "far more advanced" than anything that the USA and Israel can stop? Do you know the specifications of a patriot or Arrow 2 missile? Are you a military rocket scientist? An Arrow II still isn't great, but it has successfully a destroyed scud (which for you information ,dumbass, is technically a tactical ballistic missile, which is what most of Iran and Saudi Arabia, etc, use.).

"great many experts rate the Iranian fighter pilots as better than any other nation in the Middle East "

That doesn't matter, the Israeli pilots have had way more real combat experience, putting them at a much higher level. Look at any war in the last 2,000 years, veteran soldiers are always a resource in demand. Ancient Rome knew this, and so do modern armies. The United States army paid vets to do another round of duty in Vietnam because they didn't die quickly and knew what they were doing unlike the fresh trainees.

"How could Israel fight Iran when they couldn't even defeat tiny Lebanon?"

Again, another ignorant comment from someone biased to a certain side. Israel did not declare war on Lebanon, rather, they were pursuing specific targets within that area. However, what was surprising was the damage that Hezbollah militants were able to inflict on the Israelis, specifically their armour. Israel suffered severe tank damages during that escapade. 52 Israeli Merkava battle tanks were damaged by ATGMs, however, only 5 were completely destroyed. Again though, you can't use this to make conclusions, as the warfare would of been conducted completely different if it were in the case of all out war.

"It wouldnt even be close. Israel would crush them and they wouldnt need anything but their air force. "

Completely false, due to the size of the Iranian army, Israel would suffer SEVERE casualties if they were to try to occupy Iran. However, since generals are usually not completely daft at their trade, I would assume Israel would resort to mainly aerial attacks because of this.

"You conquer or defeat any nation by aerial bombardment alone. It never works, and never has worked."

I can't believe I just read this. You only need to look back 65 years. The USA forced Japan into capitulation through ENTIRELY aerial bombardment alone after winning the sea at war, AND this was not just because of Hiroshima. Hiroshima was nothing compared to the casualties and payload already dropped on that country from bombers. A single US soldier did not even touch Japanese soil till the end of that war. Do I need to touch on MANY more examples?
Hitler almost won the Battle of Britain until he switched to civilian targets instead of the airfields, the RAF was almost broke, and Britain would of been crippled military with zero air superiority. Germany could of then blockaded the whole island of Britain and destroyed her whole navy. For christ sakes, Israel pretty much won the whole six-day war because they destroyed the entire enemy air forces in a preemptive strike. Air superiority means EVERYTHING in modern warfare (up to a certain point). When it comes to urban fighting, guerilla warfare, and physically occupying religiously fanatical nations, other factors come into play.

"Probably Israel, but it wouldnt be as easy as many people here predict. The Tsahal is very impressive in action but considering its performance in Lebanon for example i'd say that the jewish "deus ex machina" has seen better days.
Besides you need to have a solid and committed government behind your army in times of conflict, and these wouldnt be the adjectives i'd use to describe the israeli gov... "

Probably one of the only comments written here that isn't full of egotistical-biased bull-crap.

"They are trying to destroy Palestine and the Palestinian people. "

Someone raised by some biased parents? That is a viewpoint, not a fact.
Yes, they have done horrible things, and they do handle the situation wrong sometimes (could also be a viewpoint, so many viewpoints to choose from...). HOWEVER, they were put there originally by ethnocentric post- World War II planners. In their unknowing ignorance, they chose a HORRIBLE place to put the displaced and destroyed Jewish people's. And know we are dealing with this.

In my opinion, and in the end, I always cheer for the nation that is the most democratic, and that is Israel. Universal human rights are something that has taken humanity thousands of years to accomplish, and the more dictators and countries and peoples who do not cherish human rights fall, the more doors are open so that the right for the dignity of the human spirit can spread.


Ohh, and silly me, I am completely incorrect about Israeli pilots having more combat experience. I completely forgot about the Iranian Iraq conflict, and others too. God knows how many sorties Iranian pilots have been on because of that, but I could still be wrong.
Voted : Iran would win definately. Do you know how motivated they are.?
In reply to Wehrwolf's misleading and frequently erroneous claims;

*They are not more advanced, and they are not technically called cruise missiles. ICBM sounds better. *

--- Incorrect. They have cruise missiles such as the П-270 «Москит». These are supersonic, and there's NOTHING in the USA's defences on any of the US navy vessels which can adequately stop them. Most of the US navy's vessels have no defence at all against these weapons. The Phalanx and Aegis ship defense systems may be effective against subsonic cruise missiles like the Exocets or Tomahawks, or exo-atmospheric ballistic missiles, but they are inadequate against the sea-skimming and supersonic Granits, Moskits and Yakhonts or similar types. These weapons are more advanced than what the USA has by the simple fact that the USA has NO supersonic cruise missiles.


*That doesn't matter, the Israeli pilots have had way more real combat experience, putting them at a much higher level. *

--- again, incorrect. Israel's pilots have rarely had any combat experience against other air-forces in wartime. They don't come close for experience, nor training. Their only advantage is that Israel has been able to keep their aircraft more up to date than Iran has.


*Again, another ignorant comment from someone biased to a certain side. Israel did not declare war on Lebanon, rather, they were pursuing specific targets within that area. *

--- erroneous claim by being misleading. Israel was at WAR with Lebanon, and Israel LOST that war. The technicalities of “legal” terminology whether it was declared by Israel to be a war or not are irrelevant. It was a war, and Israel lost it.


*"You conquer or defeat any nation by aerial bombardment alone. It never works, and never has worked."
I can't believe I just read this. You only need to look back 65 years. The USA forced Japan into capitulation through ENTIRELY aerial bombardment alone*

--- INCORRECT AGAIN, and I certainly CAN believe you to be capable of believing such nonsense, as you've said quite a few things already that damn your pretence at being informed. Your lack of knowledge about WW2 is astounding. Japan's capitulation only came after their military forces were devastated in the Pacific – which was not entirely an air war, but was fought on the ground and at sea – it also required that shipping be severely curtailed, fuel supplies cut, and all these actions required millions of troops to carry out. Your claim that capitulation was forced entirely through aerial bombardment is not only an insult to the efforts of the many soldiers and sailors who died, it's proof of ignorance on your part about the Pacific War.


*A single US soldier did not even touch Japanese soil till the end of that war. Do I need to touch on MANY more examples? *

--- Misleading, and again incorrect. Iwo Jima and Okinawa must've slipped you by in history lessons. The Occupation afterwards in the first few years was far from incident free, there were those who tried to resist despite the official orders from the government to stand-down. You also appear to be obliviously ignorant that the USA wasn't the only nation fighting Japan; what about the Australians, for example? Do you even know of their specific contribution? Your other references in argument don't hold up to real serious scrutiny either; Israel did not defeat their opponents in the Six Day War by air-power alone, the Germans certainly couldn't have conquered the British Isles with just planes and bombs. The truth is that air superiority is near useless without “boots on the ground”. That you could so ignorant to commonly acknowledged military strategy reminds of those chickenhawks in the Republican Party who think that they can conquer nations and pummel everyone else with aircraft alone; it's never worked yet, though you keep claiming it until the cows come home, your arguments don't change reality.


*I always cheer for the nation that is the most democratic, and that is Israel.*

--- you must be JOKING!? Surely you aren't so ignorant of Israel's lack of humanitarian values? You can't have “democracy” in any true sense while defending apartheid, discriminating against others for racist or religious reasons, or imprisoning and torturing children. Israel is pure evil, no matter what the original goals of it's founders were. It has become a haven for criminals, white slave traders, and for the worst sort of criminals – those who would kill people for their organs and sell them.

remember that 1967 Six Day War,




About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy | © 2010 BestAndWorst.com All Rights Reserved